Royal Navy tests Wildcat-drone teaming in Norway

Royal Navy Wildcats have trained with drones in Norwegian fjords. The exercise expanded maritime surveillance, targeting, and force-protection tactics while testing how uncrewed aircraft can feed information into helicopter operations.


IN Brief:

  • Royal Navy Wildcats and 700X Squadron drones have trained together during Exercise Tamber Shield in Norway.
  • The exercise used drones to scout ahead of helicopters in complex fjord conditions.
  • The work supports growing demand for maritime UAS integration, cockpit data links, and littoral force-protection systems.

Royal Navy Wildcat helicopters have trained alongside drones in Norwegian fjords during Exercise Tamber Shield, testing how uncrewed aircraft can extend maritime surveillance and improve helicopter tactics in complex littoral terrain.

The exercise involved Wildcats from 815 Naval Air Squadron, uncrewed aircraft from 700X Naval Air Squadron, RAF electronic warfare support from Spadeadam, and Norwegian naval forces. Drones were used to scout ahead of the helicopters and feed information into the wider tactical picture, allowing crews to refine their approach before moving closer to simulated threats. The activity included fast patrol boat engagements, missile-threat scenarios, and training in the demanding geography of the fjords.

Norway’s fjords provide a hard test environment for maritime aviation. Steep terrain, constrained manoeuvre space, radar shadows, cold weather, wind, and rapidly changing sea conditions expose weaknesses in sensors, communications, and operator workload. Training in that setting gives crews experience in the kind of cluttered littoral environment where fast craft, drones, shore-based weapons, and electronic warfare can compress reaction times.

The Wildcat remains a core Royal Navy aviation asset for surface surveillance, force protection, targeting, and maritime strike support. Pairing it with drones changes the way the aircraft can approach a threat area. Instead of placing the crewed helicopter at the forward edge of the search, an uncrewed aircraft can move ahead, generate sensor data, and give the crew more time to decide how to respond.

The integration work behind that approach is substantial. Helicopters need secure links, cockpit displays, mission-management tools, antennas, and procedures that allow drone information to be used without overloading the crew. Uncrewed aircraft need reliable maritime operation, resilient navigation, stable sensor payloads, and launch-and-recovery methods suited to ships and deployed squadrons. A useful teaming arrangement depends on the full system, not the drone alone.

Tamber Shield also included Martlet missile activity and torpedo runs with Sting Ray torpedoes. That combination of surveillance, targeting, missile training, and underwater weapon practice reflects the increasingly layered nature of maritime aviation. The helicopter has to identify, classify, and respond to surface and subsurface threats while also operating inside a wider ship and task group network.

The move sits naturally alongside Sting Ray’s planned P-8A trials, where an established anti-submarine weapon is being integrated with a maritime patrol aircraft. Both programmes show that maritime capability is increasingly shaped by integration work: weapons, sensors, aircraft, software, and support equipment need to be brought together in realistic operating conditions before they can deliver credible fleet value.

Uncrewed maritime systems are moving along a similar path. SubSea Craft’s MARS unmanned surface vessel has entered production, while naval autonomy programmes across Europe and the US are shifting from experimentation to repeatable manufacturing and support. Helicopter-drone teaming belongs to that broader transition, with crewed platforms increasingly acting as commanders and consumers of uncrewed sensor data.

The production demand is likely to fall heavily on retrofit and modular integration. Navies cannot replace aircraft fleets every time a new digital function is required, so upgrade packages, certified interfaces, mission kits, and software updates will shape adoption. Equipment must be rugged enough for maritime deployment and simple enough for crews to use during high-tempo operations.

The same applies to training. Crews need to practise how much trust to place in drone feeds, how to manage communications loss, and how to prioritise data during ambiguous encounters. Synthetic training, mission rehearsal, and live exercises will be needed together. Without that preparation, extra sensors risk adding noise rather than clarity.

Small drones and fast attack craft have become a persistent challenge for naval forces. Traditional ship sensors and helicopter searches remain important, but cluttered coastal waters demand greater persistence and more distributed sensing. Helicopter-drone teams offer one route to extend coverage without placing crewed aircraft immediately inside the threat envelope.

Tamber Shield shows the Royal Navy building practical experience in those patterns rather than treating uncrewed systems as stand-alone assets. The industrial task now lies in turning exercise lessons into deployable equipment, repeatable training, and supportable integration packages. Crewed helicopters will remain central to naval aviation, but their reach will increasingly be shaped by the systems flying ahead of them.